a3nm

Results 65 comments of a3nm

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:23:50AM -0800, Piotr Staszewski wrote: > Ctrl-H, Ctrl-B and Ctrl-F should work now in edit mode. > > If they don't that's probably due...

Hi, I agree it doesn't seem legal for authors to share reviews without the reviewer's agreement. For reviewers, however, I don't see a copyright problem or indeed any legal problem....

Dans le même ordre d'idée, une amélioration simple pour faciliter le dépôt et éviter les confusions serait : - de pouvoir saisir non seulement l'identifiant du document mais aussi l'URL...

Ah je ne savais pas que l'URL complète fonctionnait : je pense que c'est juste que l'intitulé du champ et sa largeur ne donnent pas envie d'essayer de coller une...

I agree with the proposal and would like to point out that "rating" as an unconventional name for "review" has also caused some confusion in our Episciences journal. It'd be...

Yes I think it would be really useful to have a different email template when the last review arrives, given that this requires the editor to take action. Currently I...

A comment: there would also be need for something like this in LMCS, which currently has a list editor-> topics https://lmcs.episciences.org/page/editorial-board and a list topic->editors https://lmcs.episciences.org/page/list-of-topics, with both being kept...

At TheoretiCS we currently involve authors by importing their papers to Overleaf. (The alternative would be to leave it entirely up to the authors to take care of formatting their...

Hi, I'm just another Episciences user, but I'm not sure I understand which part of this discussion is relevant to Episciences development, given that indeed Neptune and Overleaf are proprietary....

Thanks for clarifying. I wasn't aware that Overleaf was AGPL, sorry that I wrongly said it was proprietary -- though the AGPL edition is apparently lacking some features relative to...