Max Gautier

#12295 should help with diagnostic for those (by describing and logging the failed pods)

I'd rather get rid of the explicit check of "supported distributions" IMO. It's not like it adds anything the CI matrix and can prevent if Kubespray happens to work on...

> we have been encountering this issue in real-world usage, which has caused some inconvenience. > That is why I submitted this PR. :( The variable can be overridden /...

> @VannTen should we remove the RHEL-related condition in this version 2.30? or move to the next version? Sorry, what condition ? -- Max Gautier

Btw, not sure if you had read the conversation on slack : https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C78F00H99/p1763150495755689

Currently I'm getting > msg=\"field `arch` must be one of [x86_64 aarch64 armv7l ppc64le riscv64 s390x]; got \\\"None\\\"\\nfield `vmType` must be \\\"qemu\\\", \\\"vz\\\", \\\"wsl2\\\"; got \\\"None\\\"\\nfield `networks[0].lima` is only supported...

> Hmmm... weird..., I remember arch or vmType has a default, I thought it would be automatically determined. Yeah, if I remove the lines from the generated file it works...

Generated file look like this : ```yaml vmType: None arch: None images: - arch: x86_64 digest: sha256:f1652d29d497fb7c623433705c9fca6525d1311b11294a0f495eed55c7639d1f location: https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/noble/release-20250704/ubuntu-24.04-server-cloudimg-amd64.img - arch: aarch64 digest: sha256:bbecbb88100ee65497927ed0da247ba15af576a8855004182cf3c87265e25d35 location: https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/noble/release-20250704/ubuntu-24.04-server-cloudimg-arm64.img cpus: 2 memory: 2GiB...

Hum, if all Cilium installation are failing, that should be catched by CI, this is weird. Would you be able to come up with a reproduction that CI can detect...

I'm unsure of what we do exactly with kube_owner, from memory, it was introduced for some sort of security compliance stuff, CIS maybe ? It's not the first problem we...