Steve Dunn

icon indicating a website link https://dunnhq.com icon indicating an email [email protected]

icon location Suffolk, England icon location I currently write services in .NET for corporate clients. My career in software started in the 80's on the beloved BBCs and Commodore 64s.

Results 242 comments of Steve Dunn

Better support for the custom validation and exceptions.

It's in the next version, and it's a simple maybe/result named `ValueObjectOrError`. Hopefully released today.

Better support for the custom validation and exceptions.

Thanks for the feedback @clinington . I can't wait for DU's to be a 1st class citizen! Can I close this issue now, or is there anything else that you...

Allow multiple user pre-configured `Configurations` for ValueObjects

Thanks @jeffward01 - certainly something to think about. I'm a bit snowed under at the moment, but this could certainly be a useful addition! Thanks again.

Rename internal deserialize function

Good idea - thank you, I'll do that shortly.

Rename internal deserialize function

Thanks again for the suggestions. This will be in 4.0.3 when it is released.

Run snapshot tests in parallel

I don't think this is possible. But they run a *lot* faster in .NET 9, so it's not a massive problem.

Implement operator(s) '<, <=, >, >='

@CheloXL - thanks for the report.

Implement operator(s) '<, <=, >, >='

The trouble is, not all types that implement `IComparable` also have these operators. For instance, a Value Object of `string` reports this when the operators are added to the VO:...

Implement operator(s) '<, <=, >, >='

Hi - there's multiple aspects to this: 1. was to disable the CA warning which I think was the first fix that was added (#292 ) 2. was then to...

Implement operator(s) '<, <=, >, >='

I've looked back through my notes and found this old issue: (#222) It's non-trivial to inspect the operators on the underlying type, for instance, `int`, even though it has operators...