Arjan Bink

Hi @jm4rtin Thank you for this great proposal. Of course it is difficult to foresee if timing issues would arise from this; it would probably be easiest to just try...

Once this issue has been resolved the assertions from #457 can be checked again to see if they pass.

Hi @kangoojim , thank you for the detailed bug report. We will certainly address it in a core including PMP.

Note: This discussion is continued in https://mattermost.openhwgroup.org/all-users/channels/twg--cores--manifest

Hi @MikeOpenHWGroup Where can I find documentation on the format used in ".flist"? The format/methodology agreed upon was FuseSoc (which does not imply .flist as far as I know, but...

Hi @sorear, thank you very much for reporting this issue and obviously spending a lot of time to think it through and to propose a solution. Even though CV32E40P only...

Hi @sorear Thank you for your detailed report. Please be aware that the CV32E40P does not include the PMP. That being said, we do intend to revive this functionality on...

Hi @MikeOpenHWGroup As you can see this issue has not/never been closed. Only the duplicate issues https://github.com/openhwgroup/cv32e40p/issues/49 and openhwgroup/core-v-docs#68 have been closed.

Hi @MikeOpenHWGroup I fixed the apu_* names in the integration chapter (see https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-docs/pull/243). As far as I am concerned we are then just waiting on completion of https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-docs/pull/237, which does...

Hi @ranaya123 Power consumption is of course very application specific and as such it is difficult to recommend a good benchmark. I believe it is fair to use Coremark (as...