Tanjona R. Rabemananjara

@toonhasenack Just to echo what has been above about the re/un-weighting being self-consistent. Everything except the generation of the theory predictions should be here, ie from the computations of the...

> Hi @Radonirinaunimi and @enocera, some work is still need to fix correlations in `STAR_2009_**`, but since the number of files changed is quite huge and the procedure is rather...

So, the implementation of the correlations from the correlation matrices are fine. In this sense, datasets-wise, everything is good to go AFAICT. Re the changes that should not be part...

Unfortunately, we cannot yet use the mcfm-pol to produce predictions for $Z$ boson production. In principle, that should be doable given that the only difference between the W and Z...

> Looking here: > > https://agenda.infn.it/event/38132/contributions/234387/attachments/120751/175847/Trieste-wv.pdf > > It seems that our friends do include the 3 datapoints from PHENIX as well in their AL (W+) datasets... Interesting! I am...

> Do we want to do the same for EICc @Radonirinaunimi @enocera ? Thanks @toonhasenack and @giacomomagni for this! Could we have a theory vs data comparison here? As mentioned...

@toonhasenack, this has now be moved here https://github.com/NNPDF/nnpdf/pull/2094.

I will assign myself starting from the first one on this list and the two issues https://github.com/NNPDF/nnpdf/issues/1940 and ...

> Can someone look into this? (Our time is really limited now unfortunately) Hi @APJansen, thanks a lot for the investigation! I can have a look at this but unfortunately...

Thanks @Cmurilochem for this nice analysis. Something like this would indeed help us better visualize and select the "best" models. Regarding your questions: - I think that ultimately this will...