nora
this seems like a solution without a problem
The segfault is in C code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109916#issuecomment-1495432242
Changing a lint is never considered a breaking change as dependencies are built with cap-lints. (And crater as well I think so cratering a lint doesn't make sense)
> There is no requirement to make syscalls from libc on linux, regardless of the target environment. This is not entirely true, libcs generally do not appreciate you calling some...
In that case, this is good to merge. I will approve this PR, adding a new tier 3 no_std target for bare Linux without libc. It does not commit to...
note that there are issues with these streaming intrinsics, as they have nontemporal hints that are not properly modelled. : https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/136281-t-opsem/topic/Non-temporal.20stores
Hi, thank you for your PR! The process for adding new library APIs was changed and if you want to push your PR forward, you should open an [ACP](https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/new?assignees=&labels=api-change-proposal%2C+T-libs-api&template=api-change-proposal.md&title=%28My+API+Change+Proposal%29) instead...
I can reproduce this with the `ignore` crate directly and ```rust use ignore::Walk; fn main() { for result in Walk::new("./some_dir") { match result { Ok(entry) => println!("{}", entry.path().display()), Err(err) =>...
If you add the `glibc.static` package that test should work, but when I last tried that it introduced some new trouble. I think the way to fix this is to...