Dion Moult
Dion Moult
Agreed - who would have the technical expertise to draft the page?
Cool! Your explanation makes sense. I'm not a domain expert in infra / gis so would you mind translating your comments into a proposal? Also ping @SergejMuhic and @LeeGregory12d is...
@SergejMuhic @pjanck agreed - I've referenced #323 which solves the true north issue. If we come to an agreement on #323 we can also solve this issue.
This issue is not about the deprecation of true north - that is a separate issue that is being resolved in #323 . This issue is about the cardinality of...
> There is no software link between two "duplicated" map conversions. Any software has no way of knowing that two MapConversions are meant (i.e. intended by the authoring user) to...
Agreed. Would you like to send a pr?
1. Deleting coloured parts sound good 2. Advising to use material set association of choice sounds good 3. Sounds good to me :) 4. I would vote for colour label...
Pset_CableCarrierSegmentTypeConduitSegment still seems to have nominal width / height? JunctionLeftRadius and JunctionRightRadius should be IfcLengthMeasure not IfcPositiveLengthMeasure to allow for radius = 0 for sharp corners? Similarly, now that nominal...
You can browse the IFC docs here: http://ifc43-docs.standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4x3/HTML/lexical/IfcPropertySingleValue.htm As you can see, the Name and NominalValue are attributes of the IfcPropertySingleValue class.
Part of the issue it seems is the XBim does not support booleans from tessellations.