Mike Thompson
Mike Thompson
Hi @YoannPruvost, can you provide some addition insight into this code coverage hole?
@davideschiavone, is this valid anymore? I do not see these lint warning with Verilator-4.100.
Hi @Guilherme-Soares-Sequeira, thanks for your interest in the CV32E40Pv2. You are probably not aware that the verification environment for the v2 is still on the `cv32e40p/dev` branch of this repo....
Hello @cliffnotes, @phsauter, @thommythomaso, @hhhsiang, @Moschn and @Harshitha276. First of all, thanks for your interest in OpenHW IP, specifically the CVA6. Your contributions will always be welcome! I see there...
> Why would you allow advance constructs in the DUT? Same reason. At the OpenHW Group, our purpose is to curate "Industrial grade" IP for industrial users. We do not...
Hi @socmonster, this issue has gone stale. Has it been resolved? If so, please close it, otherwise we will close it on or after Monday, August 4, 2025. Thanks!
Thanks for the feedback @silabs-robin. This repository has multiple uses and obviously does not serve those who are interested in sign-off checklists. Part of the reason for that is that...
Thanks @DBees. Let's leave this Issue open until your PR happens.
I worry about this approach. If your goal is to verify the RTL, then you should be collecting coverage from the RTL. Having said that, the "UVM way" of handling...
This is becoming a bit of a discussion, rather than an Issue resolution, and I am not sure the code-owners of this repo want to use Issues for such discussions....