Mario Domínguez López

> @JesusPoderoso we may take a look at this since the following tests have consistently failed [projectroot.test.unittest.dds.publisher.DataWriterTests.InstancePolicyAllocationConsistencyKeyed](http://jenkins.eprosima.com:8080/job/fastdds_windows/label=windows-secure,toolset=v141/6100/testReport/junit/projectroot.test.unittest.dds/publisher/DataWriterTests_InstancePolicyAllocationConsistencyKeyed/) [projectroot.test.unittest.dds.subscriber.DataReaderTests.InstancePolicyAllocationConsistencyKeyed](http://jenkins.eprosima.com:8080/job/fastdds_windows/label=windows-secure,toolset=v141/6100/testReport/junit/projectroot.test.unittest.dds/subscriber/DataReaderTests_InstancePolicyAllocationConsistencyKeyed/) [projectroot.test.unittest.dds.topic.TopicTests.InstancePolicyAllocationConsistencyKeyed](http://jenkins.eprosima.com:8080/job/fastdds_windows/label=windows-secure,toolset=v141/6100/testReport/junit/projectroot.test.unittest.dds/topic/TopicTests_InstancePolicyAllocationConsistencyKeyed/) These tests fail because #2807 was not backported. Consequently, in `2.6.x`...

As this PR implies cherry-picking a prior PR that imposes a change of behavior, we finally decided not to go ahead with none of them.

@richiprosima please test this

Gtihub failing tests unrelated to this PR, known flakies on windows and mac.

@MiguelCompany would you mind addressing the conflicts here ?

@JesusPoderoso would you mind rebasing so that Ubuntu CI and Docs pass CI ?

@MiguelCompany Friendly ping here

@richiprosima please test this

Internally agree to close this PR

@cferreiragonz would you mind removing conflict marks here ? Also, remember replacing `EPROSIMA_LOG_INFO` with`logInfo`