Sergey Fomin

Does this really belong in `FactoryReset`? IMO a separate service would be more appropriate, something like `BootParameters.proto`

> That would mean we would have two separate services for factory reset and engaging bootz? I'd say that would be a separate service to provision this "pseudo-dhcp" configuration of...

>I think it's important to recognize that fundamentally this is about skipping DHCP boot after factory reset. Yes, but fundamentally factory reset has nothing to do with how the device...

To elaborate on my previous comment, we can ask ourselves a few questions to determine why there is no "fundamental tie." - can bootz be initiated without doing a factory...

This has been discussed in openconfig/public/pull/1060 - I've never gotten to updating my PR per comments from the community; @khrasool feel free to pick it up and open a new...

In my view, this is a problematic conclusion. It might be acceptable to allow the configuration of empty lists; however, assigning different behaviors for empty and uninitialized lists is a...

We can take a look at the sections 7.8.5-7.8.7 of [RFC7950](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7950#section-7.8.5) for lists > A list is encoded as a series of XML elements, one for each entry in >...

Is there an assumption that these two subscriptions should have any sort of conflict or override? If so, why? Each subscription can (and, in my opinion, should) be treated independently.

No, I understand what you mean; I just don't see a problem in this? If a client wants to subscribe to both, he can receive the updates accordingly. E.g. `/components/`...

>Is there a reason to force the complexity of having to deal with this? I wouldn't necessarily agree about the complexity part: if we simply treat a subscription as a...