Sergey Fomin

You need to have a license for srlinux

You need to investigate pod logs to understand the reason; most likely, you need more changes than a simple removal of the model & `openconfig` container. There are a few...

IMO this shouldn't be in gnsi model (and i would prefer to get away from `ssl` in the naming; in my opinion, it is better to use `tls`) gNSI is...

>There isn't any existing concept of a "TLS profile" which we are trying to align to, while the concept of an SSL profile identified by an ssl-profile-id already exists in...

>Would it be better to have a new "speed" leaf which is uint32 in Mbps that is generic across physical and logical interfaces? This could be introduced as a non-breaking...

For this particular change, perhaps a simple description update would be sufficient?

Thanks Rob. I agree with the behavioral part and thank you for adding the test. Perhaps the proto comment can also be updated to remove the ambiguity? https://github.com/openconfig/gribi/blob/024356c16d0ec63cceced93383bf841b7af5576f/v1/proto/service/gribi.proto#L107

``` interface Ethernet1/3 no switchport ip address 1.1.1.1/24 ipv6 address 1::1/24 ``` Note that in OC, IP addresses always belong to subinterfaces (which is not the case in this cli...

Isn't configurable behavior a better choice in this case? `standard-community-count`, `extended-community-count`, etc. Is the proposed clarification based solely on the default behavior of a single vendor?

@marenamat re: updating the RFC, this has been solved in yang 1.1 [for non-configuration data], [rfc7950](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7950.html#section-7.7).