Kristoffer Carlsson
Kristoffer Carlsson
`parse(str::SubString{String15})`, should probably get converted to a String.
Fixing https://github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl/issues/600 should fix this too.
Would it make sense to type assert the whole `opts`? Is it only `delim_flags` that is non-inferred?
> Checked it with Cthulhu and can confirm that everything's concretely typed now. Can you just confirm that Cthulhu shows the status quo as bad? I have some memory that...
Can we not have this in the julia repo? This repo should be to track things about the code. https://github.com/JuliaLang/Juleps maybe or a new repo.
Moved
Can the current functionality for `inrange` be implemented as a special choice of a `runtime` function?
Something like: ``` inrange(...) = inrange_runtime(..., runtime=index_returning_runtime_function) ``` is what I thought. So that `inrange` is just a `inrange_runtime` call with a suitable chosen runtime function. Something like `callback` might...
By the way, `inrangecount` is also a special case of this functionality, right?
Any idea why that would be? There should be no difference in the ideal case, or? Would perhaps be good to try figure out so that we don't leave performance...