Kristoffer Carlsson
Kristoffer Carlsson
> Seems worth it for avoiding all the confusing reprecompilation An alternative could be to have precompilation take into account currently loaded versions, or?
@vtjnash, how do you add a new REPL mode right now from a package? You keep saying these are bugs but they weren't bugs until the code under it changed...
Please open a new issue with a reproducer there to keep things separate and actionable.
Ref https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/issues/1717
> you can generate a portable path to a file in your package by doing a similar lookup that Artifacts do: I don't think that will work. After running `PackageCompiler`...
For this to work with PackageCompiler we need to establish: - A way to tell PackageCompiler what files it should bundle. - A convention about how these files should be...
> I feel like the simpler piece here is to have an easy way to load data relative to source code. What's hard about that right now?
Just use `@__DIR__`? That's what everyone does now and it seems to work fine, the problem is when you don't have the file so "relative to file" makes no sense.
But won't that invalidate the precompile file anyway? Maybe not?