KingOfSquares

While I think this sounds cool, it sounds like giving mapmakers powers like this will only increase possible confusion. How do you easily signal that this is/is not a possibility...

Seems like a cool thing, I never intended the verbose stats for public matches anyways so im fine with expanding upon them. Maybe we need to separate the comp version...

> Hey! I am a newbie to Open Source. Can I take up this issue? If yes can you walk me through it? It would be very helpful! :) Yes!...

> > > Hey! I am a newbie to Open Source. Can I take up this issue? If yes can you walk me through it? It would be very helpful!...

> @KingOfSquares investigated on it, and apparently, no event was being thrown by bukkit for it. I think BlockPhysicsEvent should be receiving this, but i didn't test Yep, shiny added...

Didn't avicus use something called executors or something? Could be a viable alternative to stuff not belonging under the kit term.

In what cases is this relevant? If you have any items you dont want to be dropped, why not have them on itemremove?

Im guessing this should wait until https://github.com/PGMDev/PGM/blob/d5e607d488d17330201d2b7879337b08c8075b96/core/src/main/java/tc/oc/pgm/modules/ItemKeepMatchModule.java#L95-L97 is done

Yea! I wanted to add this as well, but was unsure if it belonged in PGM. It should not be very hard to add, but would likely require some refactoring...

This is partly implemented in #598