Stefan Kerkmann
Stefan Kerkmann
I'm pulling the addition of unit-tests out of this PR into a separate one #13789 as those tests should be written against the current gold standard aka. the develop branch....
But I haven't changed anything in the core code :thinking:, was it an old version of this pr?
@zvecr Thank you!
I would very much like to merge https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/pull/13789 first, afterwards I'll rebase and continue with these issues with proper unit-tests.
Hi @ecerulm I'm currently working on #15292 which deprecates `QMK_KEYS_PER_SCAN` and makes it the default behavior. Now that we have at least some unit-tests in place I also intend to...
Yeah, If you look in the `Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR` section you can see that the original motivation for this PR was people complained that QMK is...
> bump? Still WIP, I intend to continue with it after #15292
> It looks like this code does not work when the matrix scan rate is significantly higher than the USB polling rate You're right. My (yet to be implemented) approach...