Jelte Fennema-Nio
Jelte Fennema-Nio
That does seem like quite a bad side-effect of the change. @tyranron what do you think about this. Can you think of a reason to address this? I remember some...
This sounds related to this rust-analyzer issue. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/11698 We do mark these reexported traits as `doc(hidden)`. So probably the best is to fix this rust-analyzer issue.
Can you clarify what code this would generate if the test feature is enabled? Is this request similar to this one? https://github.com/JelteF/derive_more/issues/102
Okay, so if I understand correctly, you want to put an attribute on the generated `impl`. That does seem useful. `forward` really isn't the right name though, because that already...
Moved this to the 1.1.0 milestone as this isn't a breaking change.
I think that makes sense, I like `transparent` best I think.
Hmm, that does seem like an annoying bug. Just double checking: is it also happening when using the 1.0.0-beta.6 release of derive_more?
Okay, so I took a quick look at this as part of my attempt to finally get ready to release 1.0.0 The error you get on on 1.0.0-beta.6 is a...
The name might be a bit confusing, but I think it's quite useful for clarity to use the same name as the normal testing library uses. Regarding race conditions I...
First off, did you mean to close the PR? Regarding the proposed change, I don't think I really like it. Mainly because I wouldn't have access to the helper methods...