Jelte Fennema-Nio
Jelte Fennema-Nio
I'm having a hard time understanding the usecase for such forwarding. Could you share a concrete example for when this is useful?
Seems like a useful enhancement. Especially the simple case seems easy to implement where both variants have the same type.
Those suggested additions seem pretty reasonable. A semi-related issue was added here: https://github.com/JelteF/derive_more/pull/206 I do kind of worry that the amount of methods created by the derive will explode a...
Sounds like a good derive to also support in derive_more. Feel free to contribute a PR for it.
Regarding custom bounds: so far we've been able to avoid supporting that for other derives by actually generating the correct bounds. If that's possible here too that would be great.
This is very similar to #311 btw, only for different traits.
This sounds useful. It fits well with the FromStr for unit enum support that was introduced in #176. bikeshed: I think I prefer `rename` over `rename_all`. That way you could...
A good question raised in the thread in #225 would be what should be the default? My summary of that discussion is that there are two different usages for which...
Okay this dropped off my radar. @marcocondrache at the moment we're focussing on tasks that are blockers of 1.0.0, this is not one of them, because it can be implemented...
I think assuming that we want the derive_more Debug derive to work for everything that the std Debug derive works for, then the debug feature of derive_more should depend on...