Jelte Fennema-Nio
Jelte Fennema-Nio
Closing this since there was no response from the original author, and I don't think the approach is the right one. let's continue to discuss in #173
I created this PR https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/3958. So, it would be nice if you could write a doc section on this script too.
Closing because #6444 was merged
I think communicating with Devrim would we good to do first. This likely clears up any theoretical packaging problems. If he doesn't want to maintain downgrade packages, I think it...
@marcocitus I guess you're using WSL2. I added some additional steps to the description of the PR to make it work there: > If you use WSL2 you'll likely have...
@anarazel I tried to reduce the bad effects of priority inversion a lot with a few changes. 1. We only change cpu priorities for logical replication senders that are used...
> Where is the benchmark proving this is even really solving anything? Both @onderkalaci and me did benchmarks where we did a shard moves with some load on the cluster...
@hslightdb mostly other features taking priority. One way to work around it is to distribute by a single column that contains a composite type. This type must implement a few...
What you're discribing is similar, but in this draft PR I instead added a new column of type `[]string`. I think that's cleaner than using a `;` as separator in...
Yeah, it's not as simple as I hoped. After discussing with marco, maybe we can use this instead: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/blob/main/src/backend/distributed/executor/multi_executor.c#L198