Hardikl

Results 34 comments of Hardikl

I am looking into it and trying to reproduce inter-cluster relationships locally. @Falcon667 Could you confirm these: - The mentioned behavior would be seen only when snapmirror relationships are inter-clustered...

@Falcon667 I have reproduced the issue locally via creating the inter-cluster relationships(snapmirror as well as vault). **Analysis:** Created one SnapMirror relationship from `src1` in one cluster to `dst1` in another...

@jmg011 Harvest collects qtree information via `qtree-list-iter` zapi, along with this detail, Harvest collects quota(only tree quota) related information via `quota-report-iter` in plugin. quota details can only be available after...

- For the `Disk utilization`panels, we already have them in Disk dashboard. Above right table has instant data whereas below left panel has time range data. Earlier, topk wasn't supported...

Hi @faguayot 1. Understood your perspective. I would leave this panel in Disk dashboard as-is and I have added new panels in Aggregate dashboard which would be aggregation at aggr...

updated all panels with description and units. Only pending panel is `Top Volumes with Object Storage Requests` graph, because the variable of type `volName`-`Req type`.

Added 5 panels as shown below. Me and Rahul discussed regarding the 6th panel where panel would need filter based on `volume-metric`, but due to instances/metrics independent data structure, it's...

customer discussion here: https://github.com/NetApp/harvest/discussions/2518

Build 22.08 Tested on 10.231.176.53 cluster Here is different count which are from destination side and no differentiation between local/remote detail. Build 22.11.0 Tested on 10.231.176.53 same cluster Here is...

The panels as per the link: https://grafana.com/grafana/dashboards/10181-netapp-overview/ are cluster level only. It shows 5 records (5 clusters) due to topk range selected. This is the outlook of cDot dashboard when...