Guillaume Giudicelli
Guillaume Giudicelli
> Oh, one thing I forgot: do you have a working example (not necessary to be in this PR) with the integration of this design with Components? other PR https://github.com/idaholab/moose/pull/25704
> but I believe we've decided that Action is the right approach, which I think constrains the syntax to as you have. yes. And having `type=` forward to an action...
> Let me know when this is ready for a thorough review. I'll have a lot of requests for documentation, but I'd probably just have us fix anything wrong and...
I ll make one for all of my January work soon
noice thanks a lot for the reviews. Merging so it makes the newsletters now for the tough part. NS, TM and THM
Probably should ask, who is the customer for this? And are they ok with converting the full mesh (instead of just the boundary) to tet4s ?
@miaoyinb dont worry about the OpenMPI recipe btw. It s a known openmpi bug that will go away when we update the version of openmpi used in the test. Until...
We do nested submodules for sure and it works well. I can see us adapting the recipes for the transition period if you want to do that.
Yeah I guess constitutive models arent the same as properties. TM works for me
Def easier to add. Just make a new class. MooseMesh2 created by MeshGenerators2