Gareth Jones
Gareth Jones
yup we totally should support a `aliases` kind of option
yeah what @atheck said, especially since going forward ESLint configs are always JS it should be trivial for people to pass through their options e.g. `require('./tsconfig.json')`. The option we're actually...
@fasttime yes I think that's about it in a nutshell, though in addition to unsafe autofixes it can also be about the amount of autofixes. Our primary usage of suppressions...
It just occurred to me something that will probably come up is the fact that the suppressions work based on a count, so what if a change introduced a new...
I'm still very interested in this - it would be a great help
> If accepted, it would need to be built on top of the changes proposed in https://github.com/eslint/rfcs/pull/133, as suppressions are currently only handled in the CLI fwiw I don't think...
still not stale...
@nzakas the request is that autofixes for rules that are suppressed for a file are not enabled for that file, regardless of the suppression count.
@nzakas say you've inherited a large mature code and want to apply your standard ESLint configuration to add new development, however there are a lot of existing violations and you're...
@nzakas how's this: > Let's say I have `semi` enabled as an error. When I run `--fix` it will fix those errors automatically. If I suppress the `semi` rule, then...