Danny Althoff

Despite of PR #112 I will try to work on this issue again tonight, just some planing going aroung before I have time for my projects again. Sorry for the...

I have no idea if "javapackager" will be available with JDK 11 😿 But I now got two days in a row where I could spend a small amount of...

There is already a working-branch: https://github.com/FibreFoX/javafx-gradle-plugin/tree/newyear2018release I understand the pressure of the community to have a nice way for using the javapackager through this plugin. It personally influences me already...

@aalmiray That crossed my mind too, I added some of that stuff while JDK was not-yet-released and not-yet-jigsawed. I'm already planing some evil stuff and are hoping to provide something...

@xzel23 For some workarounds I need to check against not only JDK8 vs JDK9 but for update-version too. I'm already on some experimental (non public) work to address such issues.

JDK 11 broke some other parts, and as the future of JavaFX is separated from Oracle-provided JDKs, and the javapackager (and other resources) sitting inside that JDK prior JDK11, makes...

@xzel23 normally I do not like adverizement for other plugins ;) and the functionality of this gradle-plugin is still available, on JDK > 8 it's creatable by calling the `javapackager`...

@lenborje thats the reason why I started to work on a [different project](https://github.com/FibreFoX/distribution-bundle-plugin-for-maven), but personal life drains a lot of time currently :( All work done with JavaFX and the...

@aalmiray can you link that announcement here?

Would not yet work, because this plugin does not yet support JPMS. In addition not the UI-part of JavaFX is required, but the packager-stuff, which got removed in JDK 10...