FabijanC

@TobieTom Any feedback? Or should we unassign you? EDIT: Unassigning due to unresponsiveness.

@Nanle100 You've been assigned

Fix as many as possible

@joseSalazar4 you've been assigned

Try adding two more tests: - one which simulates a tx that gets reverted (and asserting that this is what really happened) - find a way to make it revert,...

What is the motivation for this? I see that `FieldElement` of starknet-rs has `Copy` implemented

To quote Jonathan Lei's [report](https://t.me/starknet_rs/5058) regarding the update of starknet-rs to RPC 0.6.0: > It's being worked on (tracks `rc5`): > https://github.com/xJonathanLEI/starknet-rs/tree/dev/jsonrpc_0_6_0 > The core model type update is done....

Jonathan's [update](https://t.me/starknet_rs/5070): > 0.6.0 on `master` now. HIgher-level types (e.g. `Account`) don't make use of v3 txs yet, but I guess you're more interested in using it for RPC? Then...

@marioiordanov The only way I know of is by calling the class replacement syscall (hopefully it still exists). Check out this example: https://github.com/0xSpaceShard/starknet-hardhat-example/blob/master/scripts/replace.ts. Find the contract sources of `replaceable.cairo` and...

Also in Devnet-py we had a similar test case: https://github.com/0xSpaceShard/starknet-devnet/blob/master/test/test_replace_class.py