John Ericson

Also the team reminded me we don't want to give out "false hope" by accepting experimental features we never intend to stabilize, which was what I was suggesting. Fair enough.

Yes, it is better to add "or" than "not".

@RossComputerGuy I don't want to delay this too much, but with structured attrs that gets much easier.

> Derivations’ would be moved under 5.1. A lot of the derivations material should first be covered in the store section. At that point, I think we may not even...

It does look like a cabal bug. See the same build path occurring again and again in the following (truncated) log: ```console $ cabal haddock --builddir="$(pwd)/docs-dist" --haddock-for-hackage Resolving dependencies... Build...

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/326156 I put this patch in my distro and it worked great. @kientzle I think this PR avoids some of the complexities of the other one (e.g. on different flavors...

Notes from the Nix team meeting right now: @Ericson2314: We think it would be best to fix this after https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/5025 is one. The current architecture with the separate l between...

@L-as I think I need to UBSAN, because the store unit tests are failing for what looks like a random variable corruption.

If the Linux tests fail again, I think it might something to do with UBSan? I'll need to figure out how to run that locally.

Yay, fixed the UBSAN issues!