Dmytro Anansky

Results 21 issues of Dmytro Anansky

## What/Why/How? - Changes to config validation flow, linting configuration with resolved config - Extended types mixed into other oas types Changes in this PR also results in code changes...

deploy_s3_sandbox

Hi Everyone, I have a few questions about `sourceDescriptions` with the type `workflowsSpec`. It appears that the intention is to reuse workflows from other files or sources. I’m a bit...

## What/Why/How? Add Arazzo validation to the `lint` cli command. Now it is possible to lint Arazzo description file by running `redocly lint museum.yaml` ## Reference ## Testing ## Screenshots...

Hi Everyone, I encountered a scenario that isn't explicitly covered in the documentation, and I'm hoping you can clarify it for me. It is possible to define server variables in...

enhancement

## What/Why/How? Add documentation for Arazzo and AsyncAPI rules ## Reference Closes: https://github.com/Redocly/redocly-cli/issues/1691 ## Testing ## Screenshots (optional) ## Check yourself - [ ] Code changed? - Tested with redoc/reference-docs/workflows...

No Changeset Needed

**Describe the bug** New rules for `AsyncAPI` and `Arazzo` are not described in config sections like https://redocly.com/docs/cli/rules/recommended. We need to update it for all config pages: all, recommended, minimal, strict-recommended....

p2
Type: Docs

**What happened?** VS-Code does not suggest autocompletion for Arazzo spec. **What should have happened instead?** I would expect that VS-Code suggests valid Arazzo spec properties when I start typing.

p2
Type: Bug

## What/Why/How? - Removed the `type:none` sourceDescriptions Arazzo extension. - Add additional lint rule for sourceDescriptions: sourceDescriptions | [Source Description Object] | REQUIRED. A list of source descriptions (such as...

## What/Why/How? In order to eliminate `punycode` deprecated warning we need to switch from `node-fetch` package that has it as a transitive dependency. ``` $ NODE_OPTIONS='--trace-deprecation' redocly lint (node:48436) [DEP0040]...

## What/Why/How? Checking another approach to get rid off `punycode` message. ## Reference ## Testing ## Screenshots (optional) ## Check yourself - [ ] Code changed? - Tested with redoc/reference-docs/workflows...