CCS86
CCS86
I like it! On Wed, Oct 7, 2015, 3:37 AM Tim Kuipers [email protected] wrote: > Due to the gready nature of the path planning algorithm, sometimes a small > area...
I wonder if this could be related to the issue I posted here: https://github.com/Ultimaker/CuraEngine/issues/256 If the engine left behind a bunch of tiny print segments, then zoomed around to fill...
I am just testing out pressure advance on my heavily modified UMO tonight. I started at 5, and while parts of the print looked good, it seemed to be leaving...
Awesome, thanks man! I forgot about that check box
I think it's an interesting feature. It seems like it could be more simply implemented where you define a lift height, and an accel/decel length. Then any retracted travel move...
Bummer. so no easy way to just remove these infill walls: 
Yeah, the "stepped" nature of the arachne engine is disappointing. Is there a functional reason the steps couldn't be much smaller and more dense?
Checking the grams of filament used when slicing with classic vs arachne perimeters generally shows a significant reduction with arachne. This seems to corroborate the under-extrusion people are observing.
I would really love this feature too. Certain layers could definitely benefit from less cooling to improve the bond at a critical point in the model. Certain objects may also...