Benjamin Brienen
Benjamin Brienen
> Yes, there can be two fixes, but you still have an issue how to determine which one it is. I was imagining that the user would just pick one...
The behavior of implementing `Component` before this change and the behavior of implementing ` Component + ComponentMut` after this change should be identical. Do I understand that correctly?
I really like how this PR is turning out. I'm a fan of the associated type idea.
@zmbush are you still interested in working on this?
status of this? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/2b485d7f2360b2878dd2f4072ff39d82d76bed4d/crates/rust-analyzer/src/handlers/request.rs#L2250
What dependency are we waiting on to release in order to close this?
I agree. Abbreviations are generally detrimental, in my opinion. It's much easier to write code than to read it. Why make it harder to read?
That might be intentional design. Maybe someone wants to detect clicks on the invisible node. @NthTensor can you weigh in?
> Immutable components sound great ! > > I'm interested to know, although I can imagine: why an `on_mutate` hook is so tricky to implement ? 🤔 > > I...
@bas-ie what is your status on that?