Arthri

> I suppose that's where we might disagree in regards to the goal of this pr: I don't really think we /should/ replace things with native implementations I don't disagree...

Most of the work is done and involved simply replacing the references and sometimes renaming (`deepMerge` to `toMerged` and `paginate` to `chunk`). However, I'll keep the PR in draft for...

I've tested some interfaces, and they are working fine. This PR is ready for review. I've also updated the PR description with migration notes

By the way, could the PR perhaps be test merged? I'm certain there's no changes but one can't be too sure with changes this widespread

Yeah, that's what I did on my fork https://github.com/Arthri/TShock/commit/a1fce06b7a4007ebe5afd37b03230e98332b27f9. I replaced the parts relevant to TShock's SSC and left the others untouched(like /rocket)

Signs are pointing to the static data somehow not being present. This could've either been caused by static data failing to transfer on first load, or a subsequent update/refresh causing...

> There's a nice write-up of this issue by @tillig at https://www.paraesthesia.com/archive/2022/09/30/strongly-typed-resources-with-net-core/. It would be good to see an SDK feature for this to get simple, consistent behavior in Visual...

> Expanded on @tillig's approach and made it [a general-purpose](https://www.cazzulino.com/resources.html) drop-in for `Directory.Build.targets`: > > ``` > > > > PrepareResources;$(CoreCompileDependsOn) > > > > > MSBuild:Compile > $(IntermediateOutputPath)\$([MSBuild]::ValueOrDefault('%(RelativeDir)', '').Replace('\',...

Does removing it work? I suspect WPF already has a similar setting

I see. Is it possible to some block-level text to an include function? Thanks for your reply!