Anna Shaleva
Anna Shaleva
~@roman-khimov, we should include https://github.com/neo-project/neo-modules/issues/850.~ Not relevant, it will be a part of 3.6.3. And I'd suggest to consider adding https://github.com/neo-project/neo-modules/issues/852 (or at least discussing it). It's a minor issue,...
Ref. https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-api/issues/313.
Second issue is solved in #3515.
Retry mechanism should also take care of situations like https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/issues/3645.
We've tried with #3278, and turns out that `Required` functionality of `urfave/cli` not completely suits our needs. See the [comment](https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pull/3278#issuecomment-1869444068). Thus, we're closing this issue in favour of https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/issues/3097.
There's a way to validate flags with the new version of `urfave/cli`, ref. https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/issues/3097#issuecomment-2191090318, we can combine `Required` functionality with validation to reach our goal.
Blocked until https://github.com/neo-project/neo/issues/3523 resolution. I'd love to rewrite those scripts, but I'm afraid I have something to do besides this task.
Won't be done, not a priority.
And update example contracts, ref. https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pull/3605#discussion_r1793761361.
Vote up for removal, it will simplify things a lot, and I'm so glad to see this issue. From NeoGo side, we'll be able to solve our compatibility issue, because...