Andreas Borgen Longva

Thanks for working on this @owenbrooks! I'm very short on time today but I wanted to make some initial comments; I will probably have more later, when I have the...

@RReverser: vectors *are* matrices, so they'd be printed as e.g. `[1; 2; 3]`, which is not *currently* compatible with the `vector!` macro (but you could use the `matrix!` macro). However,...

Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that you have to resolve #1071 in this PR - we don't have to increase the scope. We could also do it in several...

> > @RReverser: vectors _are_ matrices, so they'd be printed as e.g. `[1; 2; 3]`, which is not _currently_ compatible with the `vector!` macro (but you could use the `matrix!`...

Just a few comments (have more to say but no time atm): I do think alignment in alternate debug mode matters a lot for readability, but I think this can...

> > I think just 4 numbers for a quaternion is ultimately ambiguous > > That's a fair point, although [the documentation](https://docs.rs/nalgebra/latest/nalgebra/geometry/struct.Quaternion.html#structfield.coords) is clear. How about `([x, y, z], w)`?...

@owenbrooks: do you intend to continue working on this issue? I think your contribution here is very valuable and I think we were close to having converged. Would be nice...

There certainly is no implementation of one in `nalgebra`. In numerical linear algebra, Gauss elimination is usually supplanted by the LU decomposition (which is in fact Gaussian elimination but we...

No, currently nothing like this is possible - and it's not likely to be possible any time soon either. A great number of methods in `nalgebra` rely on the storage...

Very closely related: #349.