Anton Haumer

@GallLeo 2. Modelica.Electrical.Machines.Examples.SynchronousMachines.SMPM_NoLoad I admit details both of the model and the comparisonSignals.txt have been changed. Please generate new reference results - thank you.

@GallLeo Regarding the timeout of Modelica.Electrical.Machines.Examples.InductionMachines.IMC_YD: I have no idea why the example takes so long to simulate with tolerance/10. It seems that something goes wrong with the iteration when...

I tried to analyze the problem a little bit: Problems with Modelica.Magnetic.QuasiStatic.FundamentalWave.Examples.BasicMachines.InductionMachines.IMC_YD is due to the fact that this example compares a QuasiStatic machine with a dynamic/transient one. The example...

Another quick solution: Change the parameters of the idealCloser to Ron=1e-4 and Goff 1e-4 (both default 1e-5) and the example runs like a charm with tolerance 1e-6 and tolerance =...

@casella you are right, I was mistaken. OM is correct, Dymola seems to have a problem with this example! @GallLeo Let's keep the comparisonSignals.txt. I have to investigate a little...

For me it seems that the parameter {opAmp1, opAmp2}.strict (on the Advanced tab) has a great influence. With strict = false the Dymola result is nonsense, with strict = true...

> The problem seems to be the state `imc.stator.zeroInductor.i0`, increasing its nominal value to 10 avoids the issue for tolerance 1e-7 and dassl. > That signal looks like a _very...

I'll provide a PR using regularized (instead of short "regul"), testing the critical examples with Dympla2025 and OM 1.24.3 (latest official release). Don't miss the discussions in #4485 - here...

@tobolar I won't tick the points, @GallLeo will do that as soon as he has created new reference results.

@GallLeo isn't this resolved now? If yes, pls. close