MSL 4.1.0 Regressions - Mechanics.Rotational and Mechanics.Translational
The following models fail in result comparison. Tested revision: f9bddf86 (2024-02-16)
Changed models, need reference update after library officer check:
-
[x] Modelica.Mechanics.Rotational.Examples.EddyCurrentBrake - Reason: The component has been enhanced in a backwards compatible way with an optional excitation input, which is demonstrated by this upgraded example. @GallLeo pls. create new reference results. - Updated reference files?
-
[x] Modelica.Mechanics.Translational.Examples.EddyCurrentBrake - Reason: The component has been enhanced in a backwards compatible way with an optional excitation input, which is demonstrated by this upgraded example. @GallLeo pls. create new reference results. - Updated reference files?
-
[ ] Release notes check: All classes mentioned which could lead to result changes in user models? @GallLeo could you please feed the explanation to the release notes? Thx a lot!
Useful Links
Current comparison report: https://www.ltx.de/download/MA/Compare_MSL_v4.1.0/comparison_report_overview.html -> Reference result test -> Comparison
Comparison signal definitions: https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/tree/master/Modelica/Resources/Reference/Modelica https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary/tree/master/ModelicaTest/Resources/Reference/ModelicaTest
Reference results: https://github.com/modelica/MAP-LIB_ReferenceResults