Tomasz Pluskiewicz

Looking at the spec now, I'm confused even more. [Trig-star section](https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/editors_draft.html#trig-star) says > RDF-star describes [quoted triples](https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/editors_draft.html#dfn-quoted), which are not necessarily present in any [named graph](https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-named-graph), or within the [default...

> Note that the above does not mean that the triple `:a :b :c` exists I would not like to make this thread philosophical, but clearly, that triple does exist,...

Fair enough on the philosophical part. That said, I did not mean to say that a quoted triple represents an assertion (truth). By itself it **does exist**, as in it...

Cannot agree with this logic.  It is quoted triple, not quad. The form `>` does not exist.  If we want to agree that a quoted triple does not belong to...

I agree that `null` would be somewhat a breaking change. Not only to n3 but the spec in general. I think that maybe this is an unanticipated consequence of RDF-*?...

Yes, thank you for complaining about variable naming and ignoring the merit. Here's a revised snippet to remove the distraction: ```js import { Quad, Quad_Graph, DatasetCore } from '@rdfjs/types' //...

That said, implementation-wise, little can potentially change. I would implement quad in a way that actually strips the `graph` from a quad when using it as subject/object of another quad...

> My reasoning has always been that it is quite evident that it is option 2: the graph with which the quad was created. I think you actually introduce yet...

I gathered my thoughts in #35 I think it's closest to Option 1 but rather than `null`, completely ignores `graph` of quoted triples. Whet implementations do is secondary, but at...

> when RDF-Star gets a graph-extension Is there an existing discussion on that matter to follow? > A triple never "exists in" a graph. It exists on its own and...