Tomasz Pluskiewicz

> We know it is quoted based on the fact that it is used as a term in the `Quad` Well, that's the thing. We don't: ```ts const fact =...

You subject is a good analogy. In the default `Quad` interface you will get an error when you try this: ```ts const quad1 = $rdf.quad(knows, a, Property) const quad2 =...

Indeed, I think I noticed that but my brain adjusted to interpret as you intended. Note again that this is not exactly equivalent to my snippets. You create 2 quads...

> Except for the fact that with the proposed changes would have a type error It shouldn't, because `Triple = Quad - Graph`. In other words, a quad should be...

> The quoted triples are thus logically placed within the :default graph This is exactly where we differ, and IMO you deviate from the RDF-star spec. The quoted triple is...

> Like in any other RDF/JS triple vs. quad discussion, I would like to know the problem you can't solve? I think you got it backwards. As outlined in my...

`Quad`, which is the default quad interface, limits the types of subject, predicate, object and graph it accepts using subtypes `Quad_Subject`, `Quad_Predicate`, `Quad_Object`, and `Quad_Graph` respectively. This prevents you from...

Hello @dhurlburtusa can we close this issue as answered or do you still find something missing?

Hm, having used vite myself, I have not experience such an issue. Could you share your project or a minimal reproduction so that I can understand what's happening here?

Oh, I came back here looking at some other PRs and I think I realise that your problem is probably with TS module resolution. I think a more robust improvement...