Tomasz Pluskiewicz

@tabatkins

Maybe you should write `slowly gain traction`? As much as I agree with you, I don't see 2017 being the turning point for Web Components. Maybe 2018? On the other...

> Also, if you were going to say something about Web Components in 2017, what would you say? I would emphasize that browser vendors have finally found middle ground and...

Ah, hey. I found my way around this by putting a style tag inside `template[data-target=prefix]`. This works well enough so maybe just some more docs around the available template targets...

@jasnell created the initial OWL document. Was it written by hand or exported from some tool like Protege?

In such case it is good that the owl is not normative. We can apply can apply the necessary changes? I do not propose anything major though. Only to have...

Anyone?

> Our OWL schema is non-normative and best-effort, and not maintained by the working group. It's not generated automatically in any way? A PR is welcome then? --- In the...

re #514 In the current shape, this PR should be closed without merging given what @nightpool also states above. `id` does not correspond to any URI. `@type` could be defined...

I just opened #515 today without realising there was this PR. Could we possibly proceed somehow here?