Tomasz Pluskiewicz

Definitely, one converter for a literal type. I'm not sure what in the design of json.net you don't like. There are three options for setting converters 1. By annotating property...

Ah, and for the third to work, the converter must `override bool CanConvert(Type objectType)`

OIC. Like you said, one converter for one (literal) type. Instead of using `string` you could wrap it in a specialized type and have a dedicated converter. Otherwise I don't...

This is implemented in proposed PR #39

https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52554#issuecomment-2060026269

And what if as a workaround it was possible to hit ENTER in the console window to force rebuild of all? Is this something any other watcher does?

1. If possible I'd keep both binding syntaxes much as Polymer allows either. I assume that it could be difficult to decide whether a binding is Polymer-native or two expression?...

Regarding expressions I too was skeptical at first but I think they are a good fit for TWC. Any non-Polymer exlression would be translated into a compute function. You allow...

I don't know. Would it not introduce a dependency on lit-html?

Maybe twc can extend lit-html syntax with 2-way binding which would be turned into listeners and setters? There's also the difference in how `@template` decorator work. Currently templates they are...