pythcoiner

> and policy code. I think this test should fail if the mempool contains an other tx double spending one of the coins? I'm just trying to understand usefullness of...

then for electrum we should at least check that inputs exists and are unspend?

> Yes, and promote the change to allow the underlying access [romanz/electrs#1212](https://github.com/romanz/electrs/pull/1212) well, to be effective you'll have to promote the change to at least 5 implementations...

the user is free to use the electrum server it uses

is this bump _needed_? our msrv is actually 1.80: https://github.com/wizardsardine/liana/blob/e6f8c9bbd915772fca021e994cf8cf19a4f695b3/rust-toolchain.toml#L2 ping @edouardparis

``` liana-cli --conf ~/.liana/regtest/daemon.toml createspend '{"bcrt1qh549zvh7sqcnf30dmqxqazvgwsh0kvtpxgh2qwrfanwjm22epuhs044art": 100000}' '[]' 1 'bcrt1q2cps2g8xm3lmy85563v8a7vlu60802c695jswfa33afmavevdhxqu5zprq' { "result": { "psbt": "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", "warnings": [] } } ```

I cannot reproduce anymore, closing

one (good ux) way can also be to offer a one click udev rules install, but we should ask user a root access, not sure if we want to do...

maybe also for `PsbtPanel.spend_txs` & `Coins.list`?

note: recorded in PSBTs if partially signed