Amit Kumar
@theRealAph would you review this trivial fix.
Thanks Tobias & Vladimir for review. I guess we are good to go now as we have 2 reviews. /integrate
@RealLucy due to copyright changes diff, I think, this one didn't get marked clean. Would you please review it :-)
/approval request bug is present in jdk17 as well. I have performed the testing and result is good. Only s390x specific change so other platforms are fine. Risk is low.
Thank you @RealLucy for review. /integrate
I have done testing on s390x and test is passing on JDK17u-dev without any issue. I guess if I backport https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8142 then it could be `clean`. But I'm not sure....
>You should never consider backporting such a huge, and unrelated, change just to achieve cleanliness of such a trivial backport. The effort you have to invest is way higher than...
/approval request Test is failing on JDK17 as well. So need to backport the fix. I have done testing and no regression seen. The change is s390x specific so should...
Thanks Lutz for review. /integrate
Hi @RealLucy, @TheRealMDoerr Can we disable the vector part in the `string_{compress, inflate, const_inflate}` and integrate this for now. I am working on static stub part and need change from...