Nick Mancuso

We will not be extending JavadocMethod, but we can keep this issue around to reference when creating new checks to replcae JavadocMethod functionality.

> @nrmancuso, is it reasonable to combine them in one Check and manage target by "tokens" ? There prons and cons ..... for both approaches. It is better to not...

I am good

I am approving this for new test input only. I also struggle to understand exactly how this check actually works vs how it is supposed to work. If we don't...

This issue is blocked by https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15437

We can come back to this after some tracker issues have been completed and we have some more experience.

After thinking on this check a bit, I believe that it is better to wait for some time to pass and this new language feature to become more widely used....

While this seems like a reasonable check, I am removing this from the Java 21 Language Features project, and we should not pursue it until we have some demand from...

I am removing this from the Java 21 language features project, ROI is usually low when considering the time spent dealing with this check.

>This seems like it might have been our fault to add method reference if it isn't a operator Yep, method reference should be in https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/checks/whitespace/separatorwrap.html#SeparatorWrap, we can open an issue...