Jon Schlinkert

Great, I'm going to create a repo on toolkit called `docs/`. This will be a temporary repo that @doowb and I will use to collate information. I'll explain this in...

k, [here is the docs repo I mentioned](https://github.com/node-toolkit/docs). To be clear, this is for @doowb and me to use for collating information. You do not need to use that repo,...

> It seems ….should.be.true returns a function. Calling that function makes the tests behave as expected for me. a previous version of `should` used that format.

Sorry I was just clarifying why the methods were written that way previously. Thank you for the PR, I’ll merge ASAP

why should the primitive check be dropped? What is the bug that's happening?

I think support for regex was removed. But we can revisit if/when a better parser is implemented. edit: I guess the readme needs to be updated too

@doowb and I talked about this a while back, I think we thought it was a good idea but couldn't decide what that would look like. any ideas for conventions/syntax...

I appreciate it, thank you. in the meantime I had to revert the merge until we get the issues I mentioned fixed.

@customcommander nice work! I only had the one comment, everything else is great. thank you!

I'll need some help understanding this. Please describe the problem first (be specific).