Christoph John

Current findings: - IIRC I only observed this on MacOS. - Strange thing is that no Heartbeat is generated for either client or server but the TestRequest because of the...

After some more failures it _seems_ indeed to happen on MacOS only. The timing seems to be a bit off, causing the heartbeat check to return false (normally `isHeartBeatNeeded()` should...

In the complete test suite I think it failed about every two or three runs. I can imagine that it has to do something with resources but to me it...

The test uses a `java.util.Timer` which is sensitive to system clock changes (which seem to happen from time to time on virtualized systems). Will test if converting to use `ScheduledExecutorService`...

I think option 1 would be the way to go. But I also don't have any insight into how much Sleepycat is used. Also see #449 which might be related...

Hi @esanchezros , thanks for the report and sorry for the delay. Unfortunately there is no way to trigger the failover programatically. This would probably a sensible enhancement since the...

In my opinion it would be a valuable addition since from my experience everyone seems to create some test tools or glue code of their own. So it could serve...

# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/netket/netket/pull/1269?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netket) Report > Merging [#1269](https://codecov.io/gh/netket/netket/pull/1269?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netket) (cb8a4c3) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/netket/netket/commit/014a242c5f7a178662a6947b7466bf5ea37e84e2?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=netket) (014a242) will **increase** coverage by `0.04%`. > The diff coverage is `92.85%`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1269 +/-...

@drosso64 , with which version did you test this? There were changes done with https://www.quickfixj.org/jira/browse/QFJ-169 to consider the unknown field to be part of the repeating group. Actually, the parser...

@wangvic apart from the things that still need to be looked at this PR could probably be part of 3.0.0 or the minor release after the next.