Ben Lesh

Let me know if you need anything for this.

I’m inclined to approve this, on the face of it. However is it possible to add a test for this?

Sorry, to clarify: we have plans to change the definition of these classes in upcoming versions, and I want to make sure we don't break anything.

Core Team: silently approved for 8.x

@akanass Yes. I know that's a "one year issue". Unfortunately, RxJS is so widely used that if we pushed out breaking changes and published new majors too often it would...

This is one option: https://api-extractor.com/pages/setup/invoking/

@cartant am I to understand that `rxjs/testing`, `rxjs/ajax`, `rxjs/operators`, et al, will not work properly with api-extractor? That's what it seems like, reading that. If that's the case, I guess...

Core Team: Still an issue... punting.

I really hate this issue. :\ Maybe just a straight diff-tool over .d.ts files would work? This is super annoying. I can't update packages with `npm audit fix` because of...

Core Team: Waiting on Node to stabilize their decision on this. (cc @benjamingr, who I think is working on getting this in Node)