Ben Lesh

I've been thinking about this, and we may want to start having error numbers and documentation links with more concise messages overall. We have to ship all of this code,...

Core Team: - Not sure if this provides a ton more value than what we have. - People usually want to know *where* the returned thing was created or returned...

Ugh... accidentally refiled here: https://github.com/ReactiveX/rxjs/issues/6030

Core Team: We've decided to wait to see how the ecosystem evolved around this for now. That's not to say it's not going to happen. Just we're not ready to...

@c-goldschmidt interesting that's faster. `of(null, scheduler)` is the same as `schedule([null], scheduler)`. Honestly, though, I'd recommend using the `animationFrames()` API instead for your use case.

@EoinGriffin-AI FYI, I'd recommend trying `debounce` with `animationFrames`. ```ts import { animationFrames, debounce } from 'rxjs'; source$.pipe(debounce(animationFrames())) ``` Otherwise, this looks like a bug related to #7017

Yeah, the schedulers are due for a major overhaul in version 8. Long overdue, actually. The fact that your solution is "faster" is a little disturbing though. I'll need to...

@EoinGriffin-AI thank you for getting me to look into this. We were creating way too many `Subscription` instances in that code. There's a PR up now to resolve that issue...

Core Team: Still uncertain about this direction, maybe we change the name of the config property to `unstable_signal` and let folks try it?

Core Team meeting: 1. @benlesh says he's worried about diving into `AbortSignal` if it is never going to meet our ergonomics needs. But would still really, really like it if...