Alejandro Colomar

I think this same issue is the one I faced lately: I compiled less 608 from source, and I can't reproduce my issue anymore.

`43c651a "Isolation: wired up per-application cgroup support internally."` `Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar `

What do you think about this simplification? Since we know truncation is not possible, it makes sense to simply not check for it. Let's reconsider; we almost shipped a bug...

> While we do check at config time (you could argue it's superfluous, but for the absolute path case it's a quick sanity check before things go too far) for...

@hongzhidao My improvement is related to the bug that I reported last week about buffer overruns. I just found another case of a buffer overrun in another part of Unit....

Hi! Yes, if all goes well, we'll release in a week or so. Cheers, Alex

Hi @andrey-zelenkov , > > They could also raise some questions about "Which one do I revert?" > > [`git blame`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-blame) provides the perfect answer for this and does the...

Hi Andrew, > Hmm, that seems to work for me... > > ``` > $ git --version > git version 2.44.0 > $ git describe > 1.32.0-47-ge75f8d5d > $ git...

> ## bcc leakage! > > This isn't a bug in your changes, just a general feature of (Neo)Mutt. Hmmm! > Experimenting with both your PRs (#4221, #4227)... > >...

thunderbird(1) is also vulnerable to this issue (but at least they show a warning). While composing such a message, it shows a warning: > When sending an encrypted message, recipients...