Alejandro Colomar

I'm reopening for consideration of something I found: thunderbird(1) does precisely this: It adds a references header, and threads the fwd with the original message. I never had any accidents...

Ahh, thunderbird(1) not only it adds a References; it adds both References and In-Reply-To, so it's just like a reply regarding these headers.

This is ready by my side. Feel free to merge when you are happy with it, @flatcap .

v1b changes: - Reviewed-by @nabijaczleweli . Thanks! ``` $ git range-diff devel/security gh/cphw_def cphw_def 1: dc32b3b11 ! 1: f3acf94bf $crypt_protected_headers_write: Change default to 'yes' @@ Commit message Link: Link: Link:...

v1c (by @flatcap ) changes: - Rebase ``` $ git range-diff devel/security..cphw_def neomutt/devel/security..gh/cphw_def 1: f3acf94bf = 1: a5ed68422 $crypt_protected_headers_write: Change default to 'yes' ```

v1d changes: - Rebase ``` $ git range-diff main..gh/cphw_def devel/security..cphw_def 1: a5ed68422 = 1: 83b5aad1a $crypt_protected_headers_write: Change default to 'yes' ```

> > Change the default behavior to `yes` > > That sounds reasonable... > > > Remove the variable > > We can easily do that too. The config system...

If you're interested in testing some patches that do gzip, there's #914 It would be interesting to see testing on real world workloads and connections, and not just my localhost...

I wonder why (some) lists inject a signature, instead of adding a header field. By adding a header field, they wouldn't be destructive to the message, and wouldn't cause problems...

Does your university add "[External Email]" to the body or to the Subject? If it's done on the subject, I hope they do it only on the unprotected subject. If...