Wuzzy

It's probably a good idea to discuss which PRs are, and which PRs are not acceptable. Acceptable PRs to me: * Bugfixes * Changes in documentation/README * Translations

I fully agree with paramat. The dependency argument cannot be dismissed easily, there is a ton of mods and servers that depend on MTG so that some major changes would...

I can get 100% behind this particular plan. Making MT more “neutral” as a whole and moving the spotlight to the particular game projects. Also, we need more of these...

> * "default" must have a standardized feature-check and version format Just add some variable names to the `default` table like `default.version`. That should do the trick. I disagree with...

I highly recommend to put the decision, recommendations and the clear current project scope down into the README file so that outsiders have a chance to know what's going on...

It made the News: https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=25152

I think the transition is already done. Can it be closed?

FYI: The engine change is no longer needed. Entities can be rolled now.

Please rename this issue to something like "Bad camera/view when sitting in cart on sloped rail".

This is a feature request and should be rejected. Preventing players from digging signs, or adding ownership to signs is a gameplay change, not a bugfix. Use protection mods.