ElliotB256

> Currently, AtomECS does it differently but I would personally think it might be more intuitive to switch to the convention to define polarization (and its handedness) in the frame...

(also @MauriceZeuner - please post code as snippets rather than images, it makes it easier to copy/paste and index :) )

2-3: I like @damienBloch 's suggestion. Being able to define 'unphysical' polarisations is not a problem if we provide a clear API for people to use. Generally, the component data...

> I think it makes sense to decide who does the compatible implementation of it that goes onto master later. I think Damien was on this issue first :) Maurice...

@MauriceZeuner might be good to leave this a week incase any newcomers want to have a go?

Looks like no new users volunteered :( so go ahead :)

Please don't close until merged!

Thanks for the report! Do you want to raise a PR or should I?

You raise a good point, it would sense to make this consistent.

Performance comparison and feature breakdown: https://amethyst.rs/posts/legion-ecs-v0.3