Yuna Verheyden

Results 66 comments of Yuna Verheyden

Ouch, that's not good. We are indeed just printing all outputs here... https://github.com/kvrhdn/go-tfe-run/blob/104d8cce779fddd82ad7a9e81fe74090b02742a9/tferun.go#L311-L314 I see it's possible to mark an output as sensitive: https://www.terraform.io/docs/language/values/outputs.html#sensitive-suppressing-values-in-cli-output Do you know if this is...

Okay this is unfortunate... after applying the config, this action will fetch the outputs and expose them as outputs in GitHub Actions. This implementation is basic but good enough, until...

Glad you got it figured out 🙂 And yeah, good idea! We could add a small example with checkout.

A tenant sending a lot of very small traces will trip up `max_traces_per_user` without actually straining the ingester significantly. In this case we would have to increase `max_traces_per_user` which can...

Yes that's right. We should also allow all of the subprocessors defined here: https://github.com/grafana/tempo/blob/main/modules/generator/processor/spanmetrics/subprocessors.go

Yeah, features come and go. Search and metrics-generator are now enabled by default, we had another temporary flag `autocomplete_filtering_enabled` that very recently got removed. I think the original request of...

Docker images are built and pushed using Drone. We use this docker manifest: [.drone/docker-manifest.tmpl](https://github.com/grafana/tempo/blob/main/.drone/docker-manifest.tmpl) There is some info about this here: [.drone/README.md#pipelines](https://github.com/grafana/tempo/tree/main/.drone#pipelines) This template will always create a `latest` tag....

Hi, agree this shouldn't be happening. We add a unique label `__metrics_gen_instance` to the series generated by each metrics-generator to ensure the series are unique between them. Since you are...

Do you maybe have any relabel configs on your remote write? Maybe you are dropping labels that would make series unique. Or do you maybe have multiple sources of these...

Nice find! Yeah, I'm not sure why this relabel config is causing issues (but I'm also not an expert on this). Maybe `^(.+)$` is too restrictive? You could try `(.*)`...