Yngve S. Kristiansen

Results 23 comments of Yngve S. Kristiansen

Known issues 2fix: * Combination is not done after final iteration the way it is done now, due to no update * (On local MacOS M1) Running `performance_utils` example takes...

newest PR: https://github.com/equinor/ert/pull/7563/files

> Note that some of this information is also available in the update snapshot: > > https://github.com/equinor/ert/blob/9f7ac75b4a8a6285659bb1ba641c14a2f9b79ec7/src/ert/analysis/_es_update.py#L60-L67 > > which is written out after an update, so might make sense...

![Screenshot 2024-03-13 at 13 24 46](https://github.com/equinor/ert/assets/11595637/e66db16d-b26d-49ba-9415-337e7eef9ab4)

Still happens if running for example snake oil with many realizations on RGS ![Screenshot 2024-04-23 at 13 48 04](https://github.com/equinor/ert/assets/11595637/89f51c34-a693-4a20-ad60-e5521126a0fa)

Note: Just removed the old style forward model specs from site config, some tests seem to be failing, will fix before merging in, perhaps also ask for a second look.

For this we could override the `check_if_runpath_exists()` in the `EverestRunModel`, then in the everest execution flow, create an everest baserunmodel right after the everest config is initialized, and invoke `check_if_runpath_exists()`....

Open question/edge case this: Will a terminal prompt mess up someones workflow? If they have a bash script they expect to just run, and `everest run` is part of that,...

Yep, it will/should be pretty flexible

> [@yngve-sk](https://github.com/yngve-sk) , do you know if the same changes must be copied to the Everest pluginmanager, or will Everest's pluginmanager be removed/merged into Ert any time soon? I think...