ylemkimon

Thank you for the PR!

@kevinbarabash Thank you for comments and the great tool! Most of changes are done by `flow-to-ts` 😄 I didn't have to do a thing. ~I'll file issues I've encountered there.~

It seems somehow I ran an old version of `flow-to-ts`. I'll update the PR, once we have stable codebase with recent PRs merged.

How feasible is it to implement glue (stretchability and shrinkability) in HTML?

IMHO, this should be up to the user to decide as swapping the math font to a system font may not be ideal.

@AEadie @edemaine Could you let me know the version of Chrome? Also, could you try the following two versions and compare results? **Windows x64** https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/chromium-browser-snapshots/o/Win_x64%2F770054%2Fchrome-win.zip?generation=1589885407916667&alt=media https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/chromium-browser-snapshots/o/Win_x64%2F770069%2Fchrome-win.zip?generation=1589887462069918&alt=media **Linux x64** https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/chromium-browser-snapshots/o/Linux_x64%2F770063%2Fchrome-linux.zip?generation=1589884575809384&alt=media https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/chromium-browser-snapshots/o/Linux_x64%2F770066%2Fchrome-linux.zip?generation=1589885298841462&alt=media...

The culprit seems to be https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d1b0fc8e45dcbe00e9060a3dba87c398425ae178, which changed rendering of the subpixel border. /cc @ronkok

I think we can use [CSS `max`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/max), `max(0.04em, 1px)` ~I'll prepare a PR.~ What do you think?

This will be fixed in Chrome 86. Thank you to the Chromium team for merging the fix into M-86. The question is whether we should release a temporary fix for...

@BrandiATMuhkuh @FischLu @MarcoBuster try setting `minRuleThickness: 0.06` or bigger.